Psy 205 Article Review Guidelines and Grading Guide
one-three Final Project: Prepare for Milestone One
User Generated
Description
- Review the Commodity Review Guidelines and Rubric document. Retrieve of a topic in forensic psychology that interests you and detect at least ane peer-reviewed article related to your topic. You lot will need to submit your selected topic and article in Module 2
Submit your selected topic, along with your citation information and a link to your selected article.
For additional details, please refer to the Article Review Guidelines and Rubric certificate in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the class.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
PSY 205: Commodity Review Guidelines and Grading Guide Overview Throughout this form, yous volition be working on a last projection that involves summarizing and reviewing a peer-reviewed article related to a topic in forensic psychology. You will be using a class wiki to piece of work on your commodity review. This easy-to-use tool facilitates collaboration, information dissemination, and application of learning, providing meaningful connections with the content and relating new knowledge with personal experience. For an fantabulous illustration of the utility and office of wikis, view Wikis in Plain English by Common Arts and crafts. Also, refer to these links for adding and editing a wiki page in Blackboard. You must create your ain page in the class wiki for you to work on and post your article review. While wikis are appropriate for grouping piece of work, they can also exist used by an private. In an individual wiki, collaboration happens between the student and the instructor (instead of betwixt grouping members). The wiki eliminates the need for multiple submissions of unique drafts. In effect, the wiki becomes the workspace where the educatee practices and perfects the project until the concluding submission. For more than data about blogs and wikis, please review these tutorials. Main Elements/Format Reading the Article Permit enough fourth dimension to empathise it. Read the commodity without taking notes to gain an overall idea of its main idea. Read the article once more analytically highlighting important ideas and making cursory notes of main ideas and master topic. Writing the Article Review Provide a synopsis of the article. Make certain to address these questions: o o o o o What is this article specifically addressing? How does this article related to your selected topic? Did the commodity contain research? Provide a summary of the research that was discussed, equally applicative. If applicable: What information was used? What instruments, if any, were used to collect data? If applicable: What were some of the conclusions, if any, to the research in this article? Your synopsis should terminate with a review and critique of your commodity. Make sure to address these questions: o o o o o What references did the author use in this article? Was the article reliable and valid? Explain. Was this commodity well-written? Thoughtful and cogitating? What were the limitations in this article? Any variables? What other thoughts or comments practise y'all accept related to this article? There is no minimum number of pages as your commodity review should alive on its ain wiki page and should be substantive. Deliverable Milestones Milestone One: Submit Selected Topic and Article (Due in Module Two) Submit your selected topic in forensic psychology, the citation information of your selected article (which must be related to your selected topic), and as a link to your article. Your selected article must exist from a peer-reviewed, professional journal (Journal of Personality Cess is an instance of a peerreviewed journal; Time, Newsweek, and Psychology Today are NOT peer-reviewed journals). Go to this site to find out more than about what a peer-reviewed commodity is, and become to this site to acquire about getting started with inquiry at Shapiro Library. If y'all located your article through Shapiro Library, make sure to note where/how y'all found it as well. This consignment is not graded, simply you lot will receive formative feedback from your teacher on whether or not your topic and article are appropriate for this assignment. Milestone Ii: Complete and Post Last Article Review in Wiki (Due in Module Seven) Post your completed article review on your page in the class wiki. Your commodity review should include all of the components described in the "Writing the Article Review" section (under Main Elements/Format) of this document. Your article review will be graded using the rubric on the following pages. Milestone Three: Review Classmates' Article Reviews (Due in Module Eight) Review at to the lowest degree two of your classmates' article reviews and provide comments on their reviews. Consider the elements in the rubric (at the end of this document) every bit well as the following questions when providing a review of your classmates' piece of work: o How well did they analyze their article? o Did they address all of the questions (in the "Writing the Article Review" section of this certificate) in their article review? o What new insights or ideas did you learn past reading their article reviews? This assignment is not graded, only you will receive formative feedback from your instructor. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Written components of projects must follow these formatting guidelines when applicative: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students tin can view instructor feedback in the Form Center. For more information, review these instructions. Disquisitional Elements Main Elements Enquiry and Analysis Integration and Awarding Critical Thinking Research Writing (Mechanics/Citations) Exemplary (100%) Includes about all of the primary elements and requirements and cites multiple examples to illustrate each chemical element Explores multiple problems through extensive collection and in-depth analysis of evidence to make informed conclusions All of the class concepts are correctly practical Demonstrates comprehensive exploration of issues and ideas earlier accepting or forming an opinion or conclusion Proficient (85%) Includes nigh of the main elements and requirements and cites many examples to illustrate each element Explores some issues through collection and in-depth analysis of evidence to make informed conclusions Needs Improvement (55%) Includes some of the main elements and requirements Not Evident (0%) Does non include any of the main elements and requirements Explores minimal issues through drove and analysis of prove to brand informed conclusions twenty Nearly of the class concepts are correctly applied Demonstrates moderate exploration of bug and ideas before accepting or forming an stance or determination Incorporates many scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of inquiry No errors related to organization, grammer and style, and citations Incorporates some scholarly resources effectively that reverberate depth and breadth of research Some of the course concepts are correctly applied Demonstrates minimal exploration of issues and ideas before accepting or forming an opinion or conclusion Incorporates very few scholarly resource that reverberate depth and latitude of enquiry Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Does non explore issues through drove and analysis of evidence and does not make informed conclusions Does not correctly apply whatsoever of the course concepts Does not demonstrate exploration of issues and ideas before accepting or forming an opinion or conclusion Does not contain scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of enquiry 15 Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Total 10 Minor errors related to organization, grammer and style, and citations Value 25 10 xx 100%
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool'due south honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Fastened.
Running caput: TOPIC AND Article Selection
Topic and Commodity Option
Name
Institution
1
TO...
xv Million Students Helped!
Sign up to view the full answer
Anonymous
Excellent! Definitely coming back for more study materials.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.five
Sitejabber
iv.iv
Source: https://www.studypool.com/discuss/4444341/1-3-Final-Project-Prepare-for-Milestone-One
0 Response to "Psy 205 Article Review Guidelines and Grading Guide"
ارسال یک نظر